The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
TEST TAKER'S RESPONSE 1.
The table compares the numbers of tourists to Ashdown Museum in a year in its two periods of renovation, and the pie charts show the feedback information of those visitors.
It is clear that many more people visited the museum after its refurbishment. We can also see that visitors' extreme satisfaction number towards the museum experienced significant increase according to the results of the surveys.
The number of people who visited Ashdown Museum before recondition was 74,000 in total that year. Dissatisfaction from visitors reported the highest proportion among the five feedbacks given, reaching at 40%, while there were just 30% who felt good during the same time. A mere 15% of respondents were quite content with the museum experience, which was almost three times less than the figure for the disappointed percentage, followed by 10% interviewees who were very unsatisfied by the museum, accompanied with 5% who gave no response.
92,000 visitors went to the museum during the following year after its refurbishment, with unexceptionable positive feedbacks escalating to 35% more than twofold of the previous data, and 40% showed appreciation to the new looks respectively. Meanwhile, the unsatisfied group fell to 15% dramatically as well as the halved number of visitors' grievance. It is noticeable that 5% people still gave no feedback to the survey.
TEST TAKER'S RESPONSE 2.
You made a surely good response to the topic. The use of language is good save for these simple errors. You could have corrected them had you carefully read through the essay. There are good sentence structures and vocabulary, though you can use more.
The subject matter is good. You developed a good introduction to the response. It hints on the data presented. In the main body, the description of the data is good. You made a good extraction of the data. There is good comparison of the data too.
The structure is standard. You developed a good introduction and main body. The cohesion is good. You linked the paragraphs well. The linkage of ideas within the paragraphs is good too.
In all, a good presentation. Just avoid the simple errors.